Diary of Preston Plummer - Part 1

I saw this film about two years ago on Netflix, first noticing that it was filmed on location in Fernandina, Amelia Island, with segments in the downtown area and Fort Clinch; two places that I have been and enjoyed on occasion.  

The plot of this story is/was also interesting; a longstanding deception created by the mother against both her daughter and father, and possibly her husband too--finally exposed in the climax.   To read more about the plot, The Diary of Preston Plummer. 

Having seen the film more than once, I was puzzled in why the mother goes to such length, presenting a lie with profound implications to seemingly those she should (or does) care about.  

Why would she lie to her family, protecting her lie(s) for so long?

But then, she goes further, defending her deception(s) as "best for them"; so in other words, she attempts to justify her lies--regardless of the damage and destruction inevitably resulting in her father's suicide and her daughter's desperation and despair. 

At the end, the mother is alone and does not seem to understand the cause & effect of deceiving others so deeply and indefensibly.  There is no remorse or contrition by her, but only contempt for her husband and daughter--as though they are betraying rather than her having betrayed them.   

More to come.  

Rights--what rights?

What are "HUMAN RIGHTS"; what rights do we each or all have, anyway? 

Albert Jay Nock, Memoirs of a Superfluous Man, warns:  

The State is everything, the individual, nothing.The individual has no rights that the State is bound to respect; no rights at all, in fact, except those that the State may choose to give him, subject to revocation at its own pleasure, with or without notice.

I know that the criminal justice system purports that the 5th Amendment is a right, part of the Bill of Rights, yet,it purposely/intentionally violates this supposed right in our courts everyday; indeed, 98% or more of criminal cases are adjudicated per the Plea Bargain--which compels a witness to self-incriminate (violating the 5th), abrogating Due Process. 

From a book I am reading now, Neither Liberty nor Safety, Robert Higgs writes: 

H. L. Mencken famously said that "every man is ashamed of the government he lives under." By now however, I am no longer ashamed because I do not identify with the government under which I live. Rather I view it as a criminal organization that without provocation has chosen to make war on my just rights--not only mine, of course, but everyone's. Although this vile enterprise is my problem, because it robs and bullies me relentlessly and without mercy,
[This government] is not my responsibility: the nail is not the hammer.  I did not ask for it and I do not want it. I fervently desire that it would simply disappear without a trace, leaving individuals free to conduct their affairs by means of voluntary cooperation, free of its incessant, gratuitous threats of force and violence against [innocent] people, and free of the ceaseless, insulting drumbeat of its moronic propaganda.    

AMERICA: THE FAREWELL TOUR, more from Chris Hedges

Continuing on Chris Hedges' most recent book., and to the question, "What is a parasite?", he writes:  

People think of a parasite as simply taking money, taking blood out of a host or taking money out of the economy. But in nature it’s much more complicated. The parasite can’t simply come in and take something. First of all, it needs to numb the host. It has an enzyme so that the host doesn’t realize the parasite’s there. And then the parasites have another enzyme that takes over the host’s brain. It makes the host imagine that the parasite is part of its own body, actually part of itself and hence to be protected. That’s basically what Wall Street has done. It depicts itself as part of the economy. Not as wrapping around it, not as external to it, but actually the part that’s helping the body grow, and that actually is responsible for most of the growth.

Parasites are insidious, as described, whether in the natural or financial world.  Time will tell; the maladies and potential tragedies that come from a parasite whether infinitesimal and seemingly innocuous or colossal and infinitely inventive. 

AMERICA: THE FAREWELL TOUR, Chris Hedges

I have read several of Chris Hedges' books and, while I do not always agree with him, his position, I deeply appreciate his convictions expressed in his written commentary and numerous interviews and speeches posted to YouTube.   

In this latest publication, he writes:  

America was founded on an imagined moral superiority and purity. The fact that dominance of others came, and still comes, from unrestrained acts of violence is washed out of the national narrative. The steadfast failure to face the truth, Baldwin warned, perpetuates a kind of collective psychosis. Unable to face the truth, white Americans stunt and destroy their capacity for self-reflection and self-criticism. They construct a world of self-serving fantasy.

I do believe that this "imagined moral superiority" is real, truth, but I do not believe that is accurately applied to all of "white Americans" or any particular race.  I believe that some realize and accept that they are not superior or better than any other, but that all really do have inalienable rights on the basis that each and all are born into corruption or sin. 

Self-reflection and criticism is part of repentance; the other part, change in the truth of it.  

 

The New Politics of Sex...Stephen Baskerville - Criminality

Most recently, the "Me Too" movement (perhaps the 4th Wave of Feminism) is recognized to potentially produce justice to/for victims of sexual harassment and/or abuse.

Well before this next wave however, a Purdue University study by Eugene J. Kanin, "False Rape Allegations", (1994) identified  41% of the "total disposed rape cases" during a nine year period were officially declared false; that is, by the complainant's admission (or recanting) that no rape had occurred.   Understand that slightly less than half of those prosecuted in these cases were, in actuality, innocent by the plaintiff's confession/clarification alone.  

Factually, what happens in these cases is not Due Process (the means justifies the end), or innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather expedience (the end justifies the means); that is, guilt is established initially not withstanding any other testimony or evidence by/for the accused. 

Obviously, expedience presumes that the one witness is telling the truth--and has no motive except some form of recompense for the alleged abuse per her testimony or statement.   

No one should dismiss the tragedy of sexual abuse, but no system of justice should deny Due Process when Law, the 5th Amendment, clearly stipulates that the accused is "innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt".  When Due Process is not followed, the objective is no long justice but rather punishment without proof.   

Authority, Power and Corruption - more from Robert Bly

Lord Acton was attributed with the commonly recognized phrase, 

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely 

Corruption, the effect, is illustrated in that cartoon, acting as an anchor beyond the buoyancy or ship's capacity to stay afloat.  It may work for awhile, corruption, but eventually brings the house down, a Titanic tragedy that takes the innocent with the guilty.    

On a personal level, Robert Bly writes in Iron John:   

There’s a general assumption now that every man in a position of power is or will soon be corrupt and oppressive. Yet the Greeks understood and praised a positive male energy that has accepted authority.

Authority and Power are not always the same. The first uses power judiciously and generally has some Skin in the Game and thus, sees the use of a power as a reflection on them, the outcome; whereas the second is much more inclined to abuse, assessing no costs are skin-lost the consequences of abuse, corruption.  

Forgiven, forgiveness - more from Robert Bly

Continuing on insights from Robert Bly, the reason(s) why forgiveness is the best course for life and living, 

Each of us deserves to be forgiven, if only for our persistence in keeping our small boat afloat when so many have gone down in the storm.

Forgiveness enables those wronged to be released from those who wronged them.  It is possible (but not impossible) that the one that wronged will never seek forgiveness--let alone admit to their wrongdoing(s).  It is within your own will or power that, when wronged, you forgive...such that their power is diminished, perhaps dead. 

Only in forgiveness are you truly free; this said from one who struggles to forgive or be forgiven.  

The deepest wound - more from Robert Bly

The image to the right (or above) is from the film, "Braveheart"; in this segment, the boy imagines sitting aside his now dead father, the sharing of, "Follow your heart".  

The fathers wounds are physical, mortal while the son's is emotional, the experience(s) of his village's sufferings under the reign of a tyrant.  

Another excerpt from Iron John,  

...where a man's wound is, that is where his genius will be.  Wherever the wound appears in our psyches...whether it stems from isolation, disability, or disease, that is precisely the place for which we will give our major gift to the community. 

Where is your wound?  If you know...than do you will to give your gifts? 

With age comes health - more from Robert Bly

Continuing on this book and the general theme of manhood, is the natural aging process.  As I share this..., age is (or has been) creeping up on me; the realities that my physique is morphing into an older version without any chance of reversal or "anti-aging".  I can pretend that I am younger but then there is reality, right? 

In Iron John, Robert Bly remarks,  "I know men who are healthier at fifty than they've ever been before, because a lot of their fear is gone." 

In this potential fear-less aging is mental or emotional maturity, "because a lot of fear is gone."

What fear(s) do I mean?  To answer that, I ask another question: 

What fear(s) do you have?

Our Fathereless Nation - the plight of the children

 

The social ills of a fatherless country are serious, a growing statistics.  What is sure about fatherhood (as positive, participating parents) is that where father's go, so to marriage and family and finally, society.  Without the presence and participation of fathers, the family as an institution is doomed.  

Where have all the fathers gone? 

There is more than one answer; that is, there are variety of reasons why...nevertheless, this social ill of our society grows and the consequences are enormous and very troubling; virtually all risks for young people are raised with the consequences often long-term, lasting a lifetime.  The most troubling aspect of this trend is that it by design; yes, the decline of fathered families is intended to undermine our society and to weaken social strength.  

More on this is sure to come.

Iron John, Robert Bly -- The perpetual "victim"

My first and only copy of this book came to me from a church, I believe, when my children were very young.  In and around that time, a men's movement called "Promised Keepers" was underway, inspired and initiated by the convictions of a college football coach.  

Robert Bly is more a poet but here, combines the mystic legends of manhood in combination with sage instruction, instances to reflect (on); here is one excerpt from the book: 

The inner boy in a messed-up family may keep on being shamed, invaded, disappointed, and paralyzed for years and years. "I am a victim," he says, over and over; and he is. But that very identification with victim-hood keeps the soul house open and available for still more invasions. Most American men today do not have enough awakened or living warriors inside to defend their soul houses. And most people, men or women, do not know what genuine outward or inward warriors would look like, or feel like.

When one is a perpetual victim or prey, everyone else is the predator, every challenge or constraint a predation, giving the excuse for  variety of indulgences and excuses.      

Neither Liberty nor Safety - Robert Higgs

"Fear is the most elemental and powerful human emotion," so says Dr. Higgs (during an interview posted to YouTube in 2009).  He elaborates that, with fear, people act instinctively rather than rationally--which is why the state is ever and always using it.  

It is not the conduct of the state so much as the capacity and capability to cause pain in the individual's life, projected or protracted to the public, society.  One recurring condition (causing fear) is a crisis   He writes in On Crisis and Government Expansion:

We know that other great crisis will come. Whether they will occasioned by foreign wars, economic collapse, or rampant terrorism no one can predict with assurance.  Yet in one form or another great crises will surely come again.... When they do, governments almost certainly will gain new powers over economics and social affairs. 

Given this cycle (or crisis...fear), what becomes of you, me and us?  
Can anyone really have a fulfilling life if constantly or continuously faced with fear?  Is Liberty or Safety possible under these conditions?   
No, not at all.     

Committment (to Marriage)

There is a growing and disturbing statistic among young people and particularly men:  

The lack of commitment  

Without commitment (and without going into the reasons for this growing statistic), what is left with a "lack but no real relationship at all--whether in marriage or any other....  

What remains for those without real relationships?  A lonely, loveless and lame life--if life at all!  Without commitment, there is no plan, but only the present, living for today without any tomorrow, a pitiful and profitless place 

Yes, commitment costs, which is why there is a lack...; that there is a perceived if not potential cost that outweighs the benefits of marriage. 

Are they right, these non-committed?    The answer is troubling to society as a whole, for in fact, marriage is a high-risk proposition, a coupling without contract or otherwise, legal precedence in matters of divorce. Add to this current condition, children, and the father incurs more risks in near-certainty that, whatever the basis of divorce, he will lose his children.   

What then is commitment (under these conditions) but uncertainty and costs beyond our ability to know except when/as such is experienced, incurred, a sad state indeed. 

  

Trust (in Love)

Trust is vital to any healthy relationship albeit family, friend or other, society.   Even in marriage, trust trumps marriage in terms of faith and commitment.   From George MacDonald:

To be trusted is a greater compliment than love. 

If trust exist and is then broken or violated--as can and does happen--getting it back is hard, maybe impossible, but part of trust is understanding that it is never the be all end all; it is not self-sustaining or sure to hold at all times without some deeper commitment, perhaps love.  With commitment, one is able to trust and keep trusting in something, if not that "someone", at least trust, a commitment to something that gives help and hope, lending truth amid much false, fraudulent, and flawed information and belief.  

Why do we trust?  Because otherwise there is only fear.  

The New Politics of Sex...Stephen Baskerville - Child Custody

As one who knows firsthand the travails of child custody, I come now with much conviction and consternation of a system that unjustifiably removes a parent from his children.  

In short, child custody is a business; an opportunity legalized per Title IV-D of the IRS code. Yes, children need to be cared for by responsible, loving parents, but the financial need is really only part of that care and further, degrades all other functions that a father potentially provides to the family.  Baskerville writes:  

Mothers are not the only ones who can profit by creating fatherless children. Governments also generate revenue from child support and therefore from the proliferation of single-parent homes.

This revenue is a subsidy; an incentive provided to each state based on their collections of child support (e.g. In the state of Alabama, for every dollar collected, the state receives two dollars per Title IV-D).  Add to this program the penalties for child support arrears or delinquency and what you have is not only a racket but also a ransom; a system that imputes a once-part with the liability for the children unjustly taken from him and in effect, establishes a "pay to play" system without any defense of his visitation. 

More to come...    

The US - Fraying at the Edges

I took this picture near my place; a defunct car lot, the flags left behind are shreds, fraying well behind the edges.   

Is the US fraying too; is our nation on the brink of some major crisis as strong, solid evidence of a trend and trajectory spiraling downward?   To answer the question is to first determine who and what we are; a nation with great influence and expanse on scale with empires.  The next question, on confirming imperialism, is to accept that all empires rise and then fall, ascend and then decline over centuries of historical existence. 

As I write this content, I can think of several reasons why any the above is certain; questions answered, answers confirmed.Thus, I accept that

The US  is fraying at the edges.  

Lock Him Up

No one wants to be caged but then some are, whether they need to be or not.   

When/as the system of justice is not just--but deliberately and intentionally evades and excuses justice, it is corrupt and criminal.  

Can the criminal justice system be itself, criminal?  

Ninety-eight percent or more of criminal cases in the U.S. are adjudicated with the plea bargain (and not by trial).  In the plea bargain, the prosecutor (or defense as a proxy) coerces the defendant to admit or confess guilt.  Often if not always, the prosecutor has already determined the verdict even before a Hearing let alone any Trial; and in this determination, the defendant is made aware of the outcome should he insist on his right to a trial.  By admitting his guilt, under compulsion, the defendant receives a lesser sentence or punishment.  Meanwhile, one part of the fifth amendment has been breached:  "No defendant shall be compelled to self-incriminate".   

Again, "Can the criminal justice system be itself, criminal?"  The answer, while clear, does not matter; for the purpose is not to determine guilt/innocence but to punish irrespective of the evidence; therefore, "Lock Him Up".


 

Taken Into Custody, Stephen Baskerville

This book, its author, is the most valued of any I have read regarding post-divorce child custody; all the details and developments of "this industry" or institution--of/for which I have myself been effected, once married with children.  

How "the system" operates would shock many; for nothing is more intrusive and invasive in the life of family than the state in the process of divorce and child custody. From the author, Stephen Baskerville, 

What is taking place here should be made very clear: citizens who are completely innocent of any legal wrongdoing and simply minding their own business--not seeking any litigation and neither convicted nor accused of any legal infraction, criminal or civil--are ordered into court and told to write checks to officials of the court or they will be summarily arrested and jailed, Judges also order citizens to sell their houses and other property and turn the proceeds over to lawyers and other cronies they never hired.

My case, while personal, is not uncommon; that is, to be forced to divorce, forced to surrender your children and forced or imputed with the liability to pay for the children unjustifiably removed from your care.  What's more, the state can and will carry this civil case further by jailing and criminalizing the non-custodial should the parent refuse or otherwise, not maintain these orders.  

Much has been written on the egregious matter and much more will come.

Feminism in America

What is feminism?  It is a movement that alleges for equality; specifically, it is an ideology that supposedly seeks political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes. 

How do you do that (assuming that it is not yet complete but is making progress, plans long underway); how do create equality when even two persons of the same gender are not purely equal and, regardless, will not be treated equality by others, public or private?   In short, can equality be achieved when it has never existed before in both the natural and supernatural?     

For women to potentially achieve egalitarianism, must they want to be men, like men or more. Does feminism want to be precisely like men and thus be equal (presuming that feminism holds masculinity as ideal)?  No, that is not what feminism seeks--to be as men--but finally, it seeks to exalt and extend the superiority of women to an entitled position of power, the end result, superiority.  Perhaps if women were superior, then the future would better for us all; after all, feminism presumes that women are not men, but better.       

They Can...?

You probably know that during WWII, when many men were drafted or enlisted in the military, there was a shortage of labor needed to support the military; and in this shortage, women were called into a service too, many more, to fill labor demand. As to the posture, this from Wikipedia, 

The poster was very little seen during World War II. It was rediscovered in the early 1980s and widely reproduced in many forms, often called "We Can Do It!" but also called "Rosie the Riveter" after the iconic figure of a strong female war production worker. The "We Can Do It!" image was used to promote feminism and other political issues beginning in the 1980s

So thinking myself of the association to the war (effort); in fact, the posture is apparently associated with feminism and the whole sense of entitlement and equality, foremost for feminism.  Can they do it, have they done it--or will they in time--is a question from one who does not really understand this movement  (because I am not part of it or have no interest...); yet, it is a part of me, us and them.  Yes, feminism is a movement that affects us all whether accepted or acknowledged.  As human behavior however, none dare or desire to be equal; that when they speak or act for equality what they are aiming for is, always, power over others regardless of what is best for the commons, community and culture. Equality is finally, in a personal or public way, not a reality.